>I currently have a virtualized cluster and am quite happy with it, however
>like yourself have found that I can only put one disk onto a shared scsi
>controller. You can however have multiple shared scsi controllers with out
>any negative effects.
>
> I could be wrong but I believe that the issue is by design.
>
>
> "Chris" <(email address - cut out)> wrote in message
> news:(email address - cut out)...
>> Hiya,
>>
>> Is there a maximum volume size on VS2005 R2?
>>
>> I am in the progress of migrating the file data to a VS Guest and trying
>> to figure out if it's better to create a disk per share or create 1 disk
>> to host all shares?I'm looking at approx 1.5 TB.
>>
>> We are planning to eventually cluster the VS's so have the quorum and
>> shared area on our san. To add a scsi controller and disk in excess of
>> 127GB i need to add a scsi controller to the guest. Does this mean the
>> guest can only have 1 volume on the shared scsi controller?
>>
>>
>>
>

> Hiya,
>
> Is there a maximum volume size on VS2005 R2?
>
> I am in the progress of migrating the file data to a VS Guest and trying
> to figure out if it's better to create a disk per share or create 1 disk
> to host all shares?I'm looking at approx 1.5 TB.
>
> We are planning to eventually cluster the VS's so have the quorum and
> shared area on our san. To add a scsi controller and disk in excess of
> 127GB i need to add a scsi controller to the guest. Does this mean the
> guest can only have 1 volume on the shared scsi controller?
>
>
>